Modern states in the Middle East are the product of colonial violence Essay

Modern states in the Middle East are the product of colonial violence. Discuss with source to two countries in the region - Essay ExampleThe earlier caliphate and later empires and sultanates were the political factors that unified Muslims in the lead colonialism (Khadduri 1951, p. 11). Colonialism is to blame for the rise in the nation-state. This is majorly because the colonizers used arbitrary and ad hoc means to create nation-states that were only meant to do some of their particular interests. Good examples to explain this concept are how Kuwait, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq and Jordan were created. Kuwait was created as a yield of the interest that the British had in the oil that was preface in the Persian Gulf. Lebanon, on the other hand, was cut out of Syria to create a state that was friendly to Arab Christians. In the case of Jordan, it was created as a present to King Abdullah for the assistance he offered to the British during the 1st World War (Khalil 1990, p. 54). The ma nner in which intimately of these territories were being re-carved led to increased tensions that were centered on the territorial, linguistic and ethnic differences that existed among Muslims previously. With this in mind, it is correct to taper out that modern states in the Middle East are a product of colonial violence. This reputation will discuss this notion with a focus on how Iraq and Syria were created as a result of colonial violence. ... From that day, Iraq was referred to as the State of Iraq. The state was to begin operating like an independent state because it was forced to grass away from the ties that it had with the rest of the Middle East. The British went ahead and brought King Faisal, who was a Hashemite, to be the ruler of the raw(a) established State of Iraq. The French, who were the colonial masters in Syria, had forced Faisal out of Syria (Omissi 1990, p. 2). The British went further and institute elites from the Sunni Arab people to head major governmen t authorities and ministries. In 1932, Iraq was granted independence by the British after long persuasions by King Faisal. The British, however, did not give up the military bases or the move through rights for their troops. King Faisal died a year later, in 1933, and was succeeded by King Ghazi. During King Ghazis time, military coups were the recite of the day. He eventually died in 1939 and was succeeded by his downstairsage son (Tripp 2002, p. 28). Syria, on the other hand, has a rummy history because some of its sections between 1098 and 1189 AD were under the Germans, Italians, English and French. This was mostly during the crusades that characterized that period. Previously, the region that is today Syria was under army of the Arab Rashidun in 640 AD (Batatu 1999, p. 21). After the period of the crusades, Syria was taken over by the Ottoman conglomerate in 1516. The French came in later in 1920 and established an independent Kingdom known as the Kingdom of Syria. The Kin gdom which did not last for long was under the leadership of Faisal 1 who belonged to the Hashemite family. The Battle of Maysalun is hellish for the short existence of the Kingdom of Syria which only lasted a