USA should Begin Withdrawing Troops from Iraq Essay Example for Free

ground forces should Begin Withdrawing Troops from Iraq EssayWar in Iraq affects many a(prenominal) countries, their social and economic situation, semipolitical stableness and international relations. A question of the the Statesn phalanx forepart in Iraq is one of the most polemical issues in political practice. During years of heated discussions, society has tried to solve the ethical, philosophical and political quandary concerning the war on terror and aggression of American disposal against Iraqi citizenry.America should withdraw process from Iraq because its military presence and occupation contradicts International Law (Hewitt, 2002). The example of the Iraqi war illustrates the fact that the problems of conflicts and emphasis are not carried out at a distance, against anonymous and invisible victims, but in straightaway physical confrontations with them. other argument is that there is the increasing violence in Iraq against the US military. Following Jeffrey Sachs Were study again that America cannot be an occupying force in the Middle East (Web Forum Was It Worth It?, 2006).Another reason against the military presence of the USA in Iraq is that primary justification for the war against terror and military intervention in Iraq (weapons of mass destruction) is false. The principal(prenominal) consequence was a shift of U.S. policy from peaceful neutrality to aggressive international policy supported by military strength. It would serve as an example of Washingtons iterate difficulty in winning guerrilla conflicts (U.S. Faces Pressure 2005).In addition, the US should withdraws troops from Iraq because the short-term consequences of its presence include increasing budget spending on military sector and security programs, temporal stability and security of the American nation. Nevertheless, the war can create more act of terrorism affected innocent people around the world. The complications are that in a orbicularizing world, rich countries cannot insulate themselves from insecurity. Poverty and weak institutions are carriage grounds for public-health crises, violence, and economic volatility.Taking into account the opposite view, it is possible to say that if the USA withdraws troops get up Iraq it will threaten its national security and defense. Also, many politicians depend that the US should implement its long-term policies aimed to beef up democracy and weakened terrorist groups in this area. Today, Iraqi army is not strong enough to oppose terrorist groups and keep open peace in the region.Republicans, warned that withdrawing U.S. troops before the Iraqi army is fully prepared to defend the res publica against an intractable insurgency would lead to more violence and possible civil war (Tate, 2006). In this case, it is intelligible that the US military presence in Iraq is important to secure stable political situation in the region. There seems to be general agreement that competition for politi cal provide and the material resources to which such index number gives access is a general explanation of the phenomena discussed in the paper.Democratic processes that aim to empower the populace with the utmost authority see the problem as a top down solution.No doubt that in modern society the main role is featured to democracy and the US presence supports elective processes in Iraq. The re-organization of the political system should be mentioned here. Also, a civil war could spill over into the rest of the region and threaten the worlds energy supplies, a development that would damage the economies of all oil-dependent countries (U.S. Faces Pressure 2005).In this situation, the purpose of US forces is to maintain the continuity of the borders while introducing a degree of regional and local autonomy. In spite of democratic changes and political stability in Iraq, the threat is real and its all the more lethal because, paradoxically or not, its driven by religion and nihili sm and a civilizations very unhappy encounter with modernity (Web Forum, 2006). In this case, the US military is a force which ensures political stability and security for civil population.I suppose that the US should not withdraw troops from Iraq because US forces and control ensures political stability for both Iraq and the US nation. Every nation has the right to go to war in order to sustain its unity, to abolish scurvy governance, to re-organize the existing political institution if they violate national rights and self-determination. The war on terror and the problem of terrorism has not been yet, and it requires special measures to be made in order to ensure global peace and political stability.From the point of view of the USA, it is a necessary step to protect its citizen from adverse intervention by a nation intending to use weapons of mass destruction. The major public concern is atomic war and its consequences for the globe. Efforts to control these activities through with(predicate) investigations and surveillance on the part of the law-enforcement community also illustrate positive measures to counter the threat of terrorism. soldiers aid to the civil power is a measure available to the Iraqi government in superior circumstances. The US military do whatever we have to do to stabilize Iraq and Afghanistan and use the military power of the U.S. to do that (Burns, 2006).It is important to note that the war in Iraq is aimed to protect civil population from the authoritarian government and its attempts to control natural resources. There is no question that Iraq is an important, if not the most important, theater in ground of the fight against Al Qaeda (Johnson, 2006).Terrorism on the Middle East is an international problem for many countries including Israel and Palestine, the US and European countries.Thus, the initiation and implementation of measures in response to the threat of terrorism are very much complex matters. The problems are magni fied when international diplomatic conventions and considerations must also be taken into account. The main means to fight terrorism include firm opposition to terrorism in all its forms and wheresoever it takes place, and opposition to domestic and international terrorism and respond to terrorist acts. The US mission in Iraq is to ensure global peace and control over the region and its terror groups.ReferencesBurns, R. (2006). Pentagon Faces Tough Choices on Iraq. USNews and World Report. Sept 20, Retrieved from http//hosted.ap.org/ propellent/stories/U/US_IRAQ?SITE=DCUSNSECTION=TOP_STORIESTEMPLATE=DEFAULTJohnson, S. (2006). We Are Where We Are Newsweek. Aug. 14. Retrieved from http//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14349435/site/newsweek/3. Hewitt, Ch. (2002). Understanding Terrorism in America From the Klan to Al Qaeda. Routledge.Tate, D. (2006). US Senate Rejects Proposals to Withdraw Troops From Iraq. June 22. Retrieved from http//voanews.com/english/archive/2006-06/2006-06-22-voa50.cfm?CF ID=38746764CFTOKEN=55075176S. Faces Pressure to Pull Troops from Iraq. (2005). Retrieved from http//www.pinr.com/report.php?ac=view_reportreport_id=328language_id=1Web Forum Was It Worth It? (2006) Tuesday, Mar. 21. Retrieved from http//www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1175256,00.html