Are We Abusing Our Free-Speech Rights Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Are We Abusing Our Free-Speech Rights - experiment ExampleThis fundamental freedom must be continually fought for in every medium and condition if the nation is to remain the shining beacon of liberty for the world. The constant battle for the preservation of free mother tongue has most recently been enjoined concerning the unabated flow of information on the profits. The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) command that radio and television was exempt from First Amendment protection therefore must comply with arbitrary contented guidelines. Though clearly a level-headed matter, the FCC gave itself the power to censor the media without virtue of a court decision. promptly that censorship has been accepted by the majority, the government is currently attempting to control the internet. The powers that be apparently believes the public is abusing its free spoken language rights. The American public seems to be in favor of restricting online gambling as well as material of a s exual nature alone this is a generation that has swelled accustomed to censorship by their government and in many cases encourages this unconstitutional practice. A disturbing skid that should end with this generation and the battle ground is cyber-space. The lucre, todays battleground for free speech The internet itself is not regulated. As efficient and enormously informative as the web is, its content is not overseen as are other communication theory mediums such as television and radio. It is a groundbreaking new applied science that has amalgamated societies of the country and the world and introduced the concept of truly free expression and the perception that nothing is taboo. Everything is subject and available at everyones literal finger-tip. The Internet has no physical, ethical or moral boundaries. Lawmakers and legal scholars generally use legal precedents from broadcast media decisions as the model for definitions of indecency and obscenity when developing regula tions presidential term the Internet. Governmental censorship rational The Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996 made it a federal crime to expose indecent material on any computer network unless the website owner utilizes effective techniques to control attack of that material to minors. This law appears to be a reasonable compromise that protects free speech and prevents children from accessing objectionable material, but in practice and effect, outlaws free speech from the Internet. The Internet allows everyone the freedom to connect with other people and suppliers world(a) but an economical means for individuals to restrict their art or thoughts to the eyes of children is yet to be developed. Because of this privation of security technology, across the board prohibition is justified under the law, a concept that is in itself considered flagitious by a strict definition of the First Amendment of the Constitution which unambiguously guarantees the right to free speech (Pi lon, 1994). Supreme Court decisions have consistently found that the First Amendment does not apply to obscene communications and have allowed communities to establish their own restrictions regarding what is obscene. The court in Miller v. California explained that if the average person would get a line the work as obscene or if it showed or expressed patently offensive sexual orchestrate without serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, the material is correctly defined as obscene (Mason, 2000). Censoring the Internet is impractical